UW scientists probe blight in potatoes
September 5, 2012 By University of Wisconsin
September 5, 2012 – As the annual potato harvest begins, Wisconsin farmers continue to check their fields for late blight.
The cooler, damper conditions that started in August are conducive to late blight in potatoes, says assistant professor Amanda Gevens, who has joint appointments with University of Wisconsin-Extension and the UW-Madison Department of Plant Pathology. She cautions that the latest highly pathogenic strain, called US-23, can destroy a field within a week.
When scouts detect the characteristic lesions – or even when late blight is rumored to be in the area – growers must reevaluate methods for limiting disease, including irrigation and the selection and timing of fungicides. They may harvest early to get the crop out of harm’s way.
“Late blight infects any aboveground tissue,” says Gevens. “Below ground, it does little damage to true roots, but it can infect the tubers. And it can devastate entire fields.”
Her particular nightmare is the potential that two strains of late blight can sexually combine to produce a spore that survives in the soil over the winter. However, those strains have not yet appeared at the same time and place in Wisconsin.
At UW-Madison, the U.S.’ largest group of potato researchers is seeking a weak link in late blight. They are advising farmers of best disease management practices, characterizing new late blight strains, and looking at the fundamental genetics and biochemistry of late blight resistance in the potato.
Jiming Jiang, a professor of horticulture, helped identify a resistance gene called RB in 2003. RB comes from a distant potato relative that cannot crossbreed with commercial potatoes, so it must be transferred through genetic engineering. Although this process has produced experimental varieties with strong resistance to blight, “Unfortunately, society does not currently accept genetic engineering for potatoes and most vegetable crops, even though we have it almost 100 per cent in soy and corn,” said Jiang.
He warns that late blight could get bad enough to force another look at genetically modified potatoes. In the meantime, he uses the system “as a model to understand the fundamentals of disease resistance, to understand why a plant that contains a single gene from a wild potato can fend off every strain of the pathogen.”
One resistance gene is not a permanent solution to late blight, cautions Dennis Halterman, a U.S. Department of Agriculture geneticist who works in the Vegetable Crops Research Unit in Madison and collaborates with Gevens and Jiang on late blight research.
“Late blight has been able to overcome a lot of resistance genes. In the 1950s and 1960s, people thought this resistance could solve the problem, but in four or five years, late blight had wiped them out.”
“We know strains of Phytophthora in Central America and Mexico can overcome RB already,” says Halterman.
Halterman is looking at a molecule called IPI-O in Phytophthora that can turn off RB, and seems to be ubiquitous in late blight.
“We believe Phytophthora needs IPI-O to cause disease” Halterman says. ”If we can target that molecule, we think that would lead to broad spectrum resistance.”
Growers continue to battle late blight through use of varietal tolerance when available and appropriately timed and selected fungicides. However, Phytophthora continues to evolve to survive new threats. The UW potato scientists warn about the future for potatoes.
“Genetic engineering provides the best hope for long-term late blight resistance,” says Halterman.
Print this page