E-Newsletter
Fruit and Vegetable Magazine
Subscription Centre
HomeDiseasesPestsIn the FieldIndustryEye On Potatoes
  ABOUT US   |   CONTACT US   |   SUBSCRIPTION CENTRE   |   ADVERTISE   |   SITEMAP
MAGAZINE
Current Issue
Past Issues
News Archives
Web Exclusives
 
Twitter
MARKETPLACE
Classifieds
New Products
Horticultural Books
Job Board
COMMUNITY
Blog
Events
 
RESOURCES
Buyers Guide
E-Newsletter
Links
Sitemap
Ethnocultural Vegetables in Canada
 
WEATHER
Choose farm zone:
NORTHERN BC
CENTRAL QUEBEC
MANITOBA
NORTHERN ALBERTA
MARITIMES
SOUTHERN ONTARIO
SASKATCHEWAN
SOUTHERN BC
SOUTHERN QUEBEC
NORTHERN ONTARIO
SOUTHERN ALBERTA
NEWFOUNDLAND
powered by:
farmzonelogo
















EPA may force pesticide label on new plum
May 5, 2010, Washington, DC – The Competitive Enterprise Institute is condemning a proposed Environmental Protection Agency action plan that would require a new biotech crop to be labeled as a pesticide. 

In approving the new plum variety – Honey Sweet – which has been bioengineered to resist plum pox virus (PPV) infection, the EPA proposes to regulate trees, cuttings, and fruit from virus-resistant plants under federal pesticide laws and label them as containing a “plant incorporated protectant.”

“(The) EPA has already concluded this plant and fruit are perfectly safe for humans and the environment,” said CEI senior fellow Gregory Conko. “Treating a mere plum as a pesticide would needlessly spread consumer confusion and add burdensome regulations on nurseries that sell the trees, farmers who grow them, and retailers who sell the fruit.”

The EPA has regulatory authority over crop plants bioengineered to produce substances that kill or repel pests. But virus-resistant crops do not produce pesticidal substances, so the agency has never before regulated them under pesticide laws. To date, virus-resistant varieties of squash, potato, and papaya have been approved for commercial-scale cultivation in the United States.  None has been regulated as a “plant incorporated protectant.”

“Unlike insect-resistant crops, bioengineered to produce a protein that is toxic to caterpillars, virus-resistant plants fend off infection without generating new proteins,” said Conko. “Classifying this plum variety as a biopesticide is legally suspect, and it cannot be justified by any concerns about the environment or human consumers.”

The C5 Honey Sweet Plum variety was developed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture at a research station in West Virginia, in cooperation with scientists from France, Spain, Poland, and Romania. It is bioengineered to resist PPV, which is harmless to humans but destroys plum, peach, nectarine, apricot, and cherry trees by rendering them sterile.

CEI filed public interest comments on the EPA’s proposed Biopesticide Registration Action Document for the C5 plum. The institute is urging the EPA to remove the plum’s classification as a biopesticide or at least to exempt trees and fruit from the labeling requirement.

 
Submit News Release